Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.485 vs 22.656
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2306 vs 1543
- 88.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2306 vs 26.1
- 14.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1514 vs 105.1
- 27.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 119.6
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 1 April 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 vs 22.656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 vs 1543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 vs 26.1 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 vs 105.1 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 119.6 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 719 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 28x more pipelines: 1344 vs 48
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.103 vs 1.888
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6514 vs 1514
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6700 vs 3333
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 719 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.103 vs 1.888 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6514 vs 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6700 vs 3333 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1346 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6440 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | 22.656 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | 2.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | 1543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | 6514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 6700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | 26.1 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | 105.1 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 119.6 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GK104 |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 1 April 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1159 | 1161 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 719 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 1344 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,933 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 80.53 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
NVIDIAQuadro2 MXR
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce3 Ti200
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 440
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670M
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640 vs
AMDRadeon R7 A360
