Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti200
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 15 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 71% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 175 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
- 512x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 64 MB
- 338x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1352 vs 4
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 339 vs 140
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 1 October 2001 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 175 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 64 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1352 vs 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 339 vs 140 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1352 | 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 339 | 140 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6548 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kelvin |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | NV20 A5 |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 1 October 2001 |
Place in performance rating | 1170 | 1169 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 175 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 57 million |
Texture fill rate | 1.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 4x |
Length | 183 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 8.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |