Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 6x more pipelines: 48 vs 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
- 128x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 256 MB
- 13.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1346 vs 97
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 340 vs 190
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 9 May 2007 |
Pipelines | 48 vs 8 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1346 vs 97 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 vs 190 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1346 | 97 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | 190 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6440 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | G86 |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 9 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1159 | 910 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 8 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 210 million |
Floating-point performance | 12.8 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 1.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR3, GDDR2 |
Shared memory | 1 | yes |
Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
nView |