Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs AMD Radeon HD 6850
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD Radeon HD 6850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 8.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 127 Watt
| Launch date | 10 July 2019 vs 21 October 2010 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 127 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6850
- 20x more pipelines: 960 vs 48
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 434 vs 389
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1972 vs 1727
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 1780
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 1780
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 2992
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 2992
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3489 vs 2792
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3489 vs 2792
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 960 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 434 vs 389 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 vs 1727 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 1780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 1780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 2992 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 2992 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3489 vs 2792 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3489 vs 2792 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6850
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | AMD Radeon HD 6850 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6387 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 434 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 | 1972 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | 3489 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | 3489 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.033 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 946.933 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.333 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.609 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.45 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | AMD Radeon HD 6850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Barts |
| Launch date | 10 July 2019 | 21 October 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 814 | 823 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
| Price now | $99.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 28.63 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 960 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 127 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 1,488.0 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 37.2 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 1,700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes | |
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| VGA | ||
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | AGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7790
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 9
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon RX 640
