Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs AMD Radeon HD 8790M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD Radeon HD 8790M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 850 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6372 vs 4920
  • Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1750 vs 1306
  • Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2992 vs 2014
  • Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2992 vs 2014
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2792 vs 2181
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2792 vs 2181
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 10 July 2019 vs 1 April 2013
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz vs 850 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 6372 vs 4920
PassMark - G3D Mark 1750 vs 1306
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2992 vs 2014
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2992 vs 2014
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2792 vs 2181
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2792 vs 2181

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8790M

  • 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
  • 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 376
  • Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2656 vs 1780
  • Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2656 vs 1780
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 48
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 751 vs 376
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2656 vs 1780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2656 vs 1780

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8790M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6372
4920
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
376
751
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1750
1306
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1780
2656
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1780
2656
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2992
2014
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2992
2014
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2792
2181
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2792
2181
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Geekbench - OpenCL 6372 4920
PassMark - G2D Mark 376 751
PassMark - G3D Mark 1750 1306
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1780 2656
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1780 2656
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2992 2014
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2992 2014
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2792 2181
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2792 2181
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 12.759
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 465.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.576
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 28.839
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 80.418
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1607

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 AMD Radeon HD 8790M

Essentials

Architecture Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) GCN 1.0
Code name Kaby Lake GT3e Mars
Launch date 10 July 2019 1 April 2013
Place in performance rating 834 837
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz 850 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 850 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Compute units 6
Floating-point performance 691.2 gflops
Texture fill rate 21.6 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,040 million

Video outputs and ports

DisplayPort support
eDP 1.2 signal support Yes
HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs

API support

DirectX 12 11
OpenGL 4.4

Memory

Memory type DDR3/DDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory Yes 0
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 64 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz

Technologies

H265/HEVC Decode
Quick Sync

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None