Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD Radeon HD 8790M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 850 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6372 vs 4920
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1750 vs 1306
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2992 vs 2014
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2992 vs 2014
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2792 vs 2181
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2792 vs 2181
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 vs 1 April 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6372 vs 4920 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1750 vs 1306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 vs 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 vs 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 vs 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 vs 2181 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8790M
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 376
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2656 vs 1780
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2656 vs 1780
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 vs 376 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2656 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2656 vs 1780 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | AMD Radeon HD 8790M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6372 | 4920 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 376 | 751 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1750 | 1306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | 2181 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.759 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.631 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.576 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.839 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 80.418 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1607 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | AMD Radeon HD 8790M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Mars |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 | 1 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 834 | 837 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 850 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes | |
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
Quick Sync | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None |