Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 14.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 215 Watt
Launch date | 10 July 2019 vs 26 March 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 9.3x more pipelines: 448 vs 48
- Around 72% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10940 vs 6369
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 405 vs 389
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3107 vs 1715
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3614 vs 1780
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3614 vs 1780
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3317 vs 2992
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3317 vs 2992
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3873 vs 2792
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3873 vs 2792
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 448 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10940 vs 6369 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 405 vs 389 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3107 vs 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3614 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3614 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3317 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3317 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3873 vs 2792 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3873 vs 2792 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6369 | 10940 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 405 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1715 | 3107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | 3614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | 3614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 3317 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 3317 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | 3873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | 3873 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.93 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 980.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.268 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.309 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.852 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | Fermi |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GF100 |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 | 26 March 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 813 | 810 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Price now | $522.01 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.87 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 448 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 215 Watt |
CUDA cores | 448 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,088.6 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 34.0 billion / sec | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes | |
HDMI | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.2 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 133.9 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1674 MHz (3348 data rate) | |
Technologies |
||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pins |