Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 14.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 215 Watt
Launch date 10 July 2019 vs 26 March 2010
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 215 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

  • 4.1x more core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 9.3x more pipelines: 448 vs 48
  • Around 72% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10940 vs 6369
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 405 vs 389
  • Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3107 vs 1715
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3614 vs 1780
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3614 vs 1780
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3317 vs 2992
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3317 vs 2992
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3873 vs 2792
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3873 vs 2792
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1215 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 448 vs 48
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 10940 vs 6369
PassMark - G2D Mark 405 vs 389
PassMark - G3D Mark 3107 vs 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3614 vs 1780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3614 vs 1780
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3317 vs 2992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3317 vs 2992
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3873 vs 2792
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3873 vs 2792

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6369
10940
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
389
405
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1715
3107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1780
3614
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1780
3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2992
3317
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2992
3317
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2792
3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2792
3873
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
Geekbench - OpenCL 6369 10940
PassMark - G2D Mark 389 405
PassMark - G3D Mark 1715 3107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1780 3614
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1780 3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2992 3317
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2992 3317
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2792 3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2792 3873
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 980.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 47.309
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 97.852
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

Essentials

Architecture Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) Fermi
Code name Kaby Lake GT3e GF100
Launch date 10 July 2019 26 March 2010
Place in performance rating 813 810
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $349
Price now $522.01
Value for money (0-100) 6.87

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1215 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 48 448
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 215 Watt
CUDA cores 448
Floating-point performance 1,088.6 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C
Texture fill rate 34.0 billion / sec
Transistor count 3,100 million

Video outputs and ports

DisplayPort support
eDP 1.2 signal support Yes
HDMI
Audio input for HDMI Internal
Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.2

Memory

Memory type DDR3/DDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory Yes 0
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB
Memory bandwidth 133.9 GB / s
Memory bus width 320 Bit
Memory clock speed 1674 MHz (3348 data rate)

Technologies

H265/HEVC Decode
Quick Sync
3D Vision
CUDA
DSR
SLI
Surround

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support 16x PCI-E 2.0
Height 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
SLI options 2-way3-way
Supplementary power connectors Two 6-pins