Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1124 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 68 Watt
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1780 vs 1577
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1780 vs 1577
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2992 vs 1671
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2992 vs 1671

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

• 3.5x more core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 13.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 48
• Around 89% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 6362
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 542 vs 389
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3551 vs 1715
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 2792
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 2792

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6362 12020
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	389 542
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1715 3551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1780 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1780 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2992 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2992 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2792 4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2792 4921

Compare specifications (specs)