Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD Radeon HD 8790M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 28% better floating-point performance: 883 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1590 vs 1306
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7012 vs 4806
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2652 vs 2181
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2652 vs 2181
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2014
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2014
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 1 April 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 vs 1306 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7012 vs 4806 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 vs 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 vs 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 2014 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8790M
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 378
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2656 vs 1564
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2656 vs 1564
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 vs 378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2656 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2656 vs 1564 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8790M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | AMD Radeon HD 8790M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 | 1306 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 378 | 751 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7012 | 4806 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 2014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.759 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.631 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.576 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.839 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 80.418 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1607 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | AMD Radeon HD 8790M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Mars |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 1 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 851 | 855 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 850 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
Compute units | 6 | |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |