Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs AMD Radeon HD 8790M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD Radeon HD 8790M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 850 MHz
  • Around 28% better floating-point performance: 883 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1590 vs 1306
  • Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7012 vs 4806
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2652 vs 2181
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2652 vs 2181
  • Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2014
  • Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2014
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 January 2017 vs 1 April 2013
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz vs 850 MHz
Floating-point performance 883 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1590 vs 1306
Geekbench - OpenCL 7012 vs 4806
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2652 vs 2181
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2652 vs 2181
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 vs 2014
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 vs 2014

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8790M

  • 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
  • Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 378
  • Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2656 vs 1564
  • Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2656 vs 1564
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 48
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 751 vs 378
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2656 vs 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2656 vs 1564

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8790M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1590
1306
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
378
751
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7012
4806
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2652
2181
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2652
2181
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1564
2656
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1564
2656
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
2014
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
2014
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 AMD Radeon HD 8790M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1590 1306
PassMark - G2D Mark 378 751
Geekbench - OpenCL 7012 4806
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2652 2181
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2652 2181
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1564 2656
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1564 2656
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 2014
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 2014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 12.759
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 465.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.576
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 28.839
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 80.418
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1607

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 AMD Radeon HD 8790M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 1.0
Code name Kaby Lake GT3e Mars
Launch date 3 January 2017 1 April 2013
Place in performance rating 851 855
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz 850 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 850 MHz
Floating-point performance 883 gflops 691.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,040 million
Compute units 6
Texture fill rate 21.6 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 11
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 2 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory 1 0
Memory bandwidth 64 GB / s
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync