Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs ATI Radeon 9800 XT
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and ATI Radeon 9800 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 30.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1734 vs 57
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 vs 160
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 1 October 2003 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 150 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1734 vs 57 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 vs 160 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9800 XT
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 412 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 412 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9800 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ATI Radeon 9800 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1734 | 57 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | 160 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7352 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ATI Radeon 9800 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Rage 9 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | R360 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 1 October 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1058 | 1055 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 412 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 117 million |
Texture fill rate | 3.3 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | DDR |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 23.36 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 730 MHz |