Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 57.02 GTexel / s vs 24.00 GB/s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
Core clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1188 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 57.02 GTexel / s vs 24.00 GB/s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 11.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Ice Lake GT2 | GM206 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $969 | $159 |
Place in performance rating | 1198 | not rated |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch date | 1 March 2016 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1188 MHz |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1024 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1690 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 845 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 24.00 GB/s | 57.02 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,825 gflops | |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 202 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 105.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |