Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs AMD Radeon Pro 455
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and AMD Radeon Pro 455 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 1762
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 1762
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 vs 30 October 2016 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 1762 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 1762 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 455
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 855 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 12x more pipelines: 768 vs 64
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4146 vs 3751
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4146 vs 3751
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 64 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4146 vs 3751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4146 vs 3751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 455
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | AMD Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3751 | 4146 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3751 | 4146 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 1762 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 1762 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3359 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3113 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11291 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.484 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 573.646 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.854 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.793 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 148.673 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | AMD Radeon Pro 455 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | Baffin |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 30 October 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 670 | 671 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.25 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.12 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 64 | 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 1,313 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 41.04 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
ATIRadeon X1550
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7610M
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M600M
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon Pro 455
