Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs ATI Radeon HD 5870
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and ATI Radeon HD 5870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 850 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 40 nm
- 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 188 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3671
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3671
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 vs 23 September 2009 |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 188 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3349 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5870
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 25x more pipelines: 1600 vs 64
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4541 vs 3751
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4541 vs 3751
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1600 vs 64 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4541 vs 3751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4541 vs 3751 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5870
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | ATI Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3751 | 4541 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3751 | 4541 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3349 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2216 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 408 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1852 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.787 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1336.393 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.773 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.496 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.813 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | ATI Radeon HD 5870 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | Cypress |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 23 September 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 670 | 792 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.25 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.12 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 64 | 1600 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 188 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 2,720.0 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 68.0 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| VGA | ||
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 282 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
ATIRadeon X1550
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7610M
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M600M
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon Pro 455
