Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3685
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 vs 25 October 2016 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3685 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- 4.3x more core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 10x more pipelines: 640 vs 64
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 vs 3751
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 vs 3751
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 64 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 vs 3751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 vs 3751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3751 | 7043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3751 | 7043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3360 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 122 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Pascal |
| Code name | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 25 October 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 655 | 586 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Price now | $124.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.25 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.12 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 64 | 640 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | 2-slot | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
ATIRadeon X800 XT
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
ATIRadeon X800 XL
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon R9 M280X
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDFirePro W6150M
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX350
