Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 797 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4.9x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 122 Watt
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3679
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3679
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 28 May 2019 vs 11 May 2013
Boost clock speed 1100 MHz vs 797 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 122 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 vs 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 vs 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3351

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

  • 2.7x more core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 24x more pipelines: 1536 vs 64
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4868 vs 3751
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4868 vs 3751
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 823 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 1536 vs 64
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4868 vs 3751
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4868 vs 3751

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3751
4868
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3751
4868
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
3679
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3351
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3751 4868
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3751 4868
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3351
PassMark - G3D Mark 3767
PassMark - G2D Mark 381
Geekbench - OpenCL 5234
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 39.934
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 705.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 78.867
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1466

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

Essentials

Architecture Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) Kepler
Code name Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 GK104
Launch date 28 May 2019 11 May 2013
Place in performance rating 658 667
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz 797 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 823 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm 28 nm
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 2.25 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 1.12 TFLOPS
Pipelines 64 1536
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt 122 Watt
CUDA cores 1536
Floating-point performance 2,448 gflops
Texture fill rate 102.0 GTexel / s
Transistor count 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

DisplayPort support
HDMI
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

API support

DirectX 12.1 12 API
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5

Memory

Memory type DDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory Yes 0
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 2500 MHz
Standard memory configuration GDDR5

Technologies

Quick Sync
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
TXAA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Interface MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size large
SLI options 1
Supplementary power connectors None