Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 797 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.9x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 122 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3679
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3679
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 May 2019 vs 11 May 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 24x more pipelines: 1536 vs 64
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4868 vs 3751
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4868 vs 3751
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 64 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 vs 3751 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 vs 3751 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3751 | 4868 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3751 | 4868 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3351 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3801 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 409 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12488 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.832 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Kepler |
Code name | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | GK104 |
Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 11 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 672 | 771 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 797 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 823 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.25 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.12 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 64 | 1536 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 122 Watt |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None |