Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 55 Watt
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8759 versus 6139
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.145 versus 24.117
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 450.087 versus 335.835
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.059 versus 1.651
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 3309
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 3309
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 55 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8759 versus 6139 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 versus 24.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 versus 335.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 versus 1.651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3309 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
- 3.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1033 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 5.3x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 72
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2145 versus 1978
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 474 versus 361
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 versus 25.346
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 versus 67.077
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2918 versus 2846
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1813 versus 1668
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2918 versus 2846
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1813 versus 1668
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 72 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2145 versus 1978 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 474 versus 361 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.096 versus 25.346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.126 versus 67.077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2918 versus 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1813 versus 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2918 versus 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1813 versus 1668 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 | 2145 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 474 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8759 | 6139 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 | 24.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 | 335.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 | 1.651 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 | 27.096 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 | 97.126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 | 2918 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1668 | 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 | 2918 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1668 | 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 655 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT4e | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 18 February 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 993 | 994 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 72 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,870 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 793.3 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.79 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 64 GB | 4 GB |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 avec des autres
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 460
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
ATIRadeon 9500
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 545v
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
AMDFirePro M5950
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile
