NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 4.1x more core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1252 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• 3.6x more pipelines: 256 vs 72
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 vs 361
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.858 vs 67.077
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 vs 1668
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 vs 1668

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

• 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
• 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 1637
• 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8750 vs 3053
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.11 vs 20.138
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 450.087 vs 318.72
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.059 vs 1.391
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.346 vs 24.886
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2846 vs 2709
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3328
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2846 vs 2709
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3328

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1637 1978
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	442 361
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3053 8750
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.138 49.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	318.72 450.087
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.391 3.059
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.886 25.346
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.858 67.077
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 2846
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 1668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 2846
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 1668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3355

Compare specifications (specs)