Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs AMD Radeon R9 M360

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and AMD Radeon R9 M360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 925 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1988 vs 1809
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8858 vs 8176
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.145 vs 19.479
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.059 vs 1.902
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2846 vs 2801
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1668 vs 1623
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2846 vs 2801
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1668 vs 1623

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360

• 3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 7.1x more pipelines: 512 vs 72
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 395 vs 362
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 575.773 vs 450.087
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.15 vs 25.346
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.811 vs 67.077

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M360

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1988 1809
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	362 395
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8858 8176
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.145 19.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	450.087 575.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.059 1.902
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.346 34.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.077 87.811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2846 2801
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 1623
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2846 2801
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 1623
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3360

Compare specifications (specs)