Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 26.4 GTexel / s
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 883.2 gflops vs 264 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1461 vs 330
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 121
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 31 January 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s vs 26.4 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops vs 264 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 105 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1461 vs 330 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 vs 121 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3128 vs 2304
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3128 vs 2304
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3128 vs 2304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3128 vs 2304 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1461 | 330 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 | 121 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2475 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4467 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 958 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 958 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 | 3128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 | 3128 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | G92 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 31 January 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 789 | 1243 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 264 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s | 26.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 105 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 384 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |