Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 and AMD Radeon R9 M280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2231 vs 814
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 vs 247
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 5 February 2015 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2231 vs 814 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 vs 247 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M280X
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 12.4x more pipelines: 896 vs 72
- 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41708 vs 10003
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 1671
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 1671
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3175
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3175
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 896 vs 72 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41708 vs 10003 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3175 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M280X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | AMD Radeon R9 M280X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2231 | 814 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 | 247 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10003 | 41708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1671 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1671 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3175 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3175 | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | AMD Radeon R9 M280X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | Saturn |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 5 February 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 662 | 664 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | 896 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 2,080 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 56 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | Not Listed | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | Not Listed |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |