AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile and Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1002 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1053 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 12.4x more pipelines: 896 vs 72
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2659 vs 2231
- 5.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51217 vs 10006
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2086 vs 1671
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3175
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2086 vs 1671
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3175
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2017 vs 1 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1002 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Pipelines | 896 vs 72 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2659 vs 2231 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 vs 10006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2086 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 vs 3175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2086 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 vs 3175 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 vs 410
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 vs 410 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2659 | 2231 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 | 509 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 | 10006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.158 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 876.241 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.983 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.599 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.258 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3301 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2086 | 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 | 3175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3301 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2086 | 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 | 3175 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.0 |
Code name | Baffin | Skylake GT4e |
Launch date | 1 March 2017 | 1 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 664 | 665 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1002 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,887 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 72 |
Texture fill rate | 58.97 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |