Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 24.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 365 Watt
- 21.3x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 vs 394
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 24 March 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 365 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 vs 394 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 14.2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 72
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3341 vs 2231
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12959 vs 10003
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1671
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1671
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3330 vs 3175
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3330 vs 3175
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 72 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 vs 2231 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12959 vs 10003 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 vs 3175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 vs 3175 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2231 | 3341 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 | 394 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10003 | 12959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1671 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1671 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3175 | 3330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3175 | 3330 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.921 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1116.126 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.799 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.114 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.239 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4118 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4118 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT4e | GF110 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 24 March 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 665 | 773 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Price now | $184 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 30.41 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 72 | 1024 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 365 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,000 million |
| CUDA cores | 1024 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 1,244.2 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 77.7 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | Quad | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 327.7 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) | |
| Memory clock speed | 1707 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 with others
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5900
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7610M
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
AMDFirePro D500
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 730
