Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 55 Watt
- 64x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10056 vs 9306
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 18 February 2014 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10056 vs 9306 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 7.1x more pipelines: 512 vs 72
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3337 vs 1845
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 513 vs 448
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 1671
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 1671
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3175
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3175
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 72 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 vs 1845 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 513 vs 448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3175 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1845 | 3337 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 448 | 513 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10056 | 9306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1671 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1671 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3175 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3175 | 3346 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | GM107 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 18 February 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 746 | 747 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | |
Price now | $150.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | 512 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,870 million |
CUDA cores | 512 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 1 GB |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |