Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs ATI Radeon HD 5850
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and ATI Radeon HD 5850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 725 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 10.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 151 Watt
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 402
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 30 September 2009 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 151 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 vs 402 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5850
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3806 vs 2536
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3806 vs 2536
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1586
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1586
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2418
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2418
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1979 vs 1626
- 5.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33977 vs 5885
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3806 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3806 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 2418 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1979 vs 1626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33977 vs 5885 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5850
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | ATI Radeon HD 5850 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2536 | 3806 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2536 | 3806 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1586 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1586 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 | 3358 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 | 402 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1626 | 1979 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5885 | 33977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.467 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1109.612 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.541 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.08 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | ATI Radeon HD 5850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | Cypress |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 30 September 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 724 | 757 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 151 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 2,154 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,088.0 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1440 | |
Texture fill rate | 52.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity |