AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2565 vs 1592
- Around 88% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10585 vs 5634
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4551 vs 2536
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3607 vs 1586
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2418
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4551 vs 2536
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3607 vs 1586
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2418
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 vs 5 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2565 vs 1592 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10585 vs 5634 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4551 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3607 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4551 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3607 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 2418 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 573 vs 429
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 573 vs 429 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2565 | 1592 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 429 | 573 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10585 | 5634 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.959 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.134 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.893 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.245 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4551 | 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3607 | 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4551 | 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3607 | 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 2418 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | Lexa | Broadwell GT3e |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 | 5 September 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 729 | 732 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |