AMD Radeon R9 M385 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M385 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M385

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3002 vs 1586
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3002 vs 1586
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3322 vs 2418
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3322 vs 2418
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2061 vs 1626

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 244

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M385
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3002 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3002 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3322 2418
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3322 2418
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	244 572
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2061 1626

Compare specifications (specs)