Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 12 nm
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 16 Mar 2020 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 12 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- 22.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3172 vs 142
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 vs 142 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 142 | 3172 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6514 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39228 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1982 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1982 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Turing |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT2 | N18P-G62 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 16 Mar 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 1698 | 425 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Compute units | 96 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 422.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.379 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 26.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | |
Width | IGP | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR6 |