Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 12 nm
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 16 Mar 2020 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 12 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- 22.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3172 vs 142
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 vs 142 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 142 | 3172 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6514 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39228 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1982 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1982 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Tiger Lake GT2 | N18P-G62 |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 16 Mar 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 1698 | 425 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Compute units | 96 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1035 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 422.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.379 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 26.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | |
| Width | IGP | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
