Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 1852x more texture fill rate: 105.6 GTexel/s vs 57.02 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 1 March 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s vs 57.02 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Core clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1188 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 142 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT2 | GM206 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 1 March 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1698 | not rated |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1188 MHz |
Compute units | 96 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1024 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 422.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.379 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 26.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s | 57.02 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,825 gflops | |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 202 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 105.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |