Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- 1523.1x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 52 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14238 vs 10258
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 2315
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 2315
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3462 vs 3162
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3462 vs 3162
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1972 vs 1633
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 26 October 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s vs 52 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 vs 10258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 vs 2315 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 vs 2315 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 vs 3162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 vs 3162 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 vs 1633 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 3214
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 3214
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 373 vs 311
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 3214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 3214 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 373 vs 311 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 | 10258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 2315 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 2315 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 3162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 3162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3339 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 373 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 1633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.977 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.874 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.177 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.847 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 167.399 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | DG1 | Raven |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 26 October 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 523 | 912 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Compute units | 96 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 52 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 1,664 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 4,940 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | IGP |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 12.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | DDR4 |

