Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs Intel HD Graphics 5000
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and Intel HD Graphics 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
- Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 19.2x more pipelines: 768 vs 40
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 22 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 30 Watt
- 4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14238 vs 3134
- 9.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 713
- 9.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 713
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3462 vs 1103
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3462 vs 1103
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3214 vs 1713
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3214 vs 1713
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 311 vs 221
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1972 vs 587
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 27 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 40 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 vs 3134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 vs 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 vs 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 vs 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 vs 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 vs 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 vs 1713 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 vs 221 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 vs 587 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | Intel HD Graphics 5000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 | 3134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 1713 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 221 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.563 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 490.588 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | DG1 | Haswell GT3 |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 27 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 523 | 1388 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Compute units | 96 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 22 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 40 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |