Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1620 MHz
- 1018.5x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 77.76 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 16 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 1 February 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1620 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s vs 77.76 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- 5x more core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 14238
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 6889
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 6889
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 3462
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 3462
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 3214
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 3214
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 vs 311
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5918 vs 1972
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 vs 14238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 vs 6889 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 vs 6889 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 vs 3462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 vs 3462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 3214 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 vs 311 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 vs 1972 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 | 20732 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3336 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 323 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 5918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Pascal |
Code name | DG1 | GP106B |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 1 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 523 | 533 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Compute units | 96 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1493 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 77.76 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops | |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 112.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection |