Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1485 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 42% higher memory clock speed: 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 2 Apr 2020 |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1485 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- 4.5x more core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 79.20 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41907 vs 14238
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 6889
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 6889
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3462
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3462
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3214
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3214
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 380 vs 311
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7539 vs 1972
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 95.04 GTexel/s vs 79.20 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 vs 14238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 vs 6889 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 vs 6889 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 vs 3462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 vs 3462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 vs 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 vs 3214 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 vs 311 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7539 vs 1972 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 | 41907 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 12180 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 12180 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 8926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 8926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 8062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 8062 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 380 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 7539 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Turing |
Code name | DG1 | TU117 |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 2 Apr 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 523 | 267 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1485 MHz |
Compute units | 96 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | 3.041 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | 47.52 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 95.04 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR6 |