Intel UHD Graphics 600 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 5.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 5 Watt versus 29 Watt
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.952 versus 2.471
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.427 versus 0.233
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.882 versus 4.053
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1000 versus 835
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1701 versus 1155
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1000 versus 835
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1701 versus 1155
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 versus 2 April 2012 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt versus 29 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 versus 2.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.427 versus 0.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.882 versus 4.053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 versus 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 versus 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 versus 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 versus 1155 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- 4.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 200 MHz
- 4x plus de pipelines: 48 versus 12
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 322 versus 318
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 131 versus 92
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1283 versus 1004
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 77.99 versus 56.77
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.018 versus 5.876
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 555 versus 476
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 555 versus 476
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 48 versus 12 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 322 versus 318 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 131 versus 92 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1283 versus 1004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 versus 56.77 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 versus 5.876 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 versus 476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 versus 476 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 318 | 322 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 92 | 131 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1004 | 1283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 | 2.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.77 | 77.99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.427 | 0.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.876 | 6.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.882 | 4.053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 476 | 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 | 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 | 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 476 | 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 | 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 | 1155 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 87 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Gemini Lake GT1 | GF119 |
| Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 | 2 April 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1624 | 1626 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $39.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.13 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 750 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 12 | 48 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 29 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 292 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 48 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 155.5 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 102 °C | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.5 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 1024 MB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 600 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7500 LE
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1500
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8600 GT
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8250
