Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 12.8x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 64 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740

• 5x more core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 200 MHz
• 32x more pipelines: 384 vs 12
• 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1469 vs 318
• 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 349 vs 92
• 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4271 vs 1004
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.994 vs 5.952
• 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 291.627 vs 56.77
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.023 vs 0.427
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.139 vs 5.876
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.651 vs 6.882
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1790 vs 476
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1427 vs 1000
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2153 vs 1701
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1790 vs 476
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1427 vs 1000
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2153 vs 1701

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	318 1469
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	92 349
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1004 4271
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.952 11.994
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	56.77 291.627
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.427 1.023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.876 15.139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.882 23.651
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 1790
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1000 1427
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 2153
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 1790
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1000 1427
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 2153

Compare specifications (specs)