Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 610 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 693 vs 630
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1071 vs 988
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1071 vs 988
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 3 June 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 vs 630 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 vs 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 vs 988 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 171
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 vs 2697
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 vs 1241
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 vs 1241
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 vs 1699
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 vs 1699
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 vs 171 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 vs 2697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 vs 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 vs 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 vs 1699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 vs 1699 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 | 630 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2697 | 3210 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 | 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 | 2808 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 7.5 |
| Code name | Coffee Lake GT1 | Haswell GT2 |
| Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 3 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1350 | 1359 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 392 million |
| Floating-point performance | 50 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 20 | |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||


