Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 615

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 2520x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel/s vs 10 GTexel / s
• 5x better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 80 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
• 10x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 32x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 512 MB
• 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 723 vs 231
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 178 vs 89

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

• 2.1x more core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 32 vs 24

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	723 231
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	178 89

Compare specifications (specs)