Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 ZT
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 617 and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 ZT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 617
- Videocard is newer: launch date 15 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 19384.6x more texture fill rate: 25.20 GTexel/s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 129
- 26.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 874 vs 33
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 vs 12 May 2003 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.20 GTexel/s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 vs 129 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 874 vs 33 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 ZT
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 325 MHz vs 300 MHz
| Core clock speed | 325 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 617
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 ZT
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 ZT |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3290 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1313 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1313 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1461 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1461 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1633 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1633 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | 129 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 874 | 33 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 617 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 ZT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Rankine |
| Code name | Amber Lake GT2 | NV35 |
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 | 12 May 2003 |
| Place in performance rating | 1223 | 1220 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 325 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 100.8 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 403.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 24 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 3.150 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.20 GTexel/s | 1.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 135 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 8x |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 9.0a |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.5 (2.1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 617 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 SE
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5900 ZT
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930M
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260X
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 940
