Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Intel HD Graphics 520

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and Intel HD Graphics 520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 vs 864
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 209
• Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4592 vs 3993
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 21.852
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 vs 143.083
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 vs 1.243
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 vs 12.958
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.881 vs 28.182
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 vs 951
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 vs 951

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520

• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1462 vs 878
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 2227
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1462 vs 878
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 2227
• 5.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 326 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 520

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 864
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 209
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 3993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 21.852
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 143.083
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 1.243
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 12.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 28.182
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 1462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 1462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3337
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	62 326

Compare specifications (specs)