Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus Intel HD Graphics 520
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and Intel HD Graphics 520 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 versus 864
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 versus 209
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4592 versus 3993
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 versus 21.852
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 versus 143.083
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 versus 1.243
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 versus 12.958
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.881 versus 28.182
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 versus 951
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 versus 951
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 1 September 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 versus 864 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 versus 209 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 versus 3993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 versus 21.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 versus 143.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 versus 1.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 versus 12.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 versus 28.182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 versus 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 versus 951 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 520
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1462 versus 878
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 versus 2227
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1462 versus 878
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 versus 2227
- 5.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 326 versus 62
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 versus 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 versus 2227 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 versus 62 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 520
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Intel HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 864 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 209 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 3993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 21.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 143.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 1.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 12.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 28.182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3337 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 | 326 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Intel HD Graphics 520 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.0 |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | Skylake GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 1 September 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1380 | 1381 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 24 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 620 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
