Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
• 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 vs 532
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 152
• Around 92% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4592 vs 2387
• 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 5.055
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 vs 215.004
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 vs 0.635
• Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 vs 10.393
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.881 vs 19.903
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 vs 967
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 vs 967

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

• 4x more pipelines: 96 vs 24
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2227
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2227

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 532
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 152
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 2387
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 5.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 215.004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 10.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 19.903
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 967
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 2766
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 967
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 2766
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3359

Compare specifications (specs)