Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 33 Watt
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 versus 532
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 versus 152
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4592 versus 2387
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 versus 5.055
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 versus 215.004
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 versus 0.635
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 versus 10.393
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.881 versus 19.903
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 versus 967
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 versus 967
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 22 March 2012 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 33 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 versus 532 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 versus 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 versus 2387 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 versus 5.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 versus 215.004 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 versus 0.635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 versus 10.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 versus 19.903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 versus 967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 versus 967 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- 4x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 24
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 versus 878
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 2227
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 versus 878
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 2227
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 96 versus 24 |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 versus 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 versus 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 2227 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 532 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 2387 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 5.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 215.004 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 0.635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 10.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 19.903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 2766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 2766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 22 March 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1380 | 1390 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 96 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 585 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
DirectX 11.2 | 12 API | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |