Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 5 February 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M OEM
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 640 vs 24 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M OEM
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | GM107 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 5 February 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1380 | not rated |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 640 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,870 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |