Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1175 MHz
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 4 July 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1175 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 65.8 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- 37.3x more pipelines: 896 vs 24
- 4.6x better floating-point performance: 2,106 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 65.8 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 24 |
Floating-point performance | 2,106 gflops vs 460.8 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | Polaris 21 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 4 July 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 1234 | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1175 MHz |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1090 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | 2,106 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 896 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 65.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |