Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Intel HD Graphics 530

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and Intel HD Graphics 530 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
• Around 14% better floating-point performance: 460.8 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 995
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 vs 254
• Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 vs 4397
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 vs 330.464
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 vs 19.781
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 1045
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 1045

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 vs 27.517
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.177 vs 29.327
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3309
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3309
• 5.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 384 vs 68

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 530

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 995
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 254
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 4397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 30.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 330.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 1.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 19.781
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 30.177
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3346
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	68 384

Compare specifications (specs)