Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 55 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

• 2.9x more core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 34.72 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
• 2.4x better floating-point performance: 1,111 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3337 vs 1237
• Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 vs 299
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9306 vs 4657
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.239 vs 27.517
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 639.427 vs 354.254
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.341 vs 1.807
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32 vs 20.323
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.814 vs 29.327
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3309
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3309
• 15.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1050 vs 68

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 3337
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 515
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 9306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 34.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 639.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 2.341
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 69.814
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 4498
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 4498
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3346
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	68 1050

Compare specifications (specs)