Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs AMD FirePro D500
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 730 and AMD FirePro D500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 224.1x more texture fill rate: 15.60 GTexel/s vs 69.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 18.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 274 Watt
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 vs 3685
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 vs 3685
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 18 January 2014 |
| Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s vs 69.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 274 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 vs 3685 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D500
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 1536 vs 192
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17662 vs 5839
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6020 vs 2429
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 3309
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6020 vs 2429
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 3309
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 192 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17662 vs 5839 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6020 vs 2429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6020 vs 2429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3309 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D500
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | AMD FirePro D500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1619 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5839 | 17662 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 | 6020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 | 6020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.776 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.081 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.568 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.789 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 730 | AMD FirePro D500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 2021 | 18 January 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 663 | 666 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Compute units | 24 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s | 69.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 274 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 2,227 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 279 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 243.8 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 730 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5900
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415 OEM
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
AMDFirePro D500
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
AMDRadeon R7 250X
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
