Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 730 and AMD Radeon R7 250X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 730

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • 410.5x more texture fill rate: 15.60 GTexel/s vs 38 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 80 Watt
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 vs 3716
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 vs 3716
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2021 vs 13 February 2014
Boost clock speed 1300 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate 15.60 GTexel/s vs 38 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 80 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 5221 vs 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 5221 vs 3716

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250X

  • 3.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 192
  • Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2269 vs 1582
  • Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 637 vs 395
  • Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3916 vs 2429
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3309
  • Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3916 vs 2429
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3309
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 640 vs 192
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2269 vs 1582
PassMark - G2D Mark 637 vs 395
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3916 vs 2429
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3916 vs 2429
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3309

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250X

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1582
2269
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
395
637
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2429
3916
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5221
3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2429
3916
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5221
3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
3358
Name Intel UHD Graphics 730 AMD Radeon R7 250X
PassMark - G3D Mark 1582 2269
PassMark - G2D Mark 395 637
Geekbench - OpenCL 5967
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2429 3916
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 5221 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3309 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2429 3916
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 5221 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3309 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 603 0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 32.22
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 638.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.963
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 51.987
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 151.963

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 730 AMD Radeon R7 250X

Essentials

Architecture Generation 12.1 GCN 1.0
Code name Rocket Lake GT1 Cape Verde
Launch date 2021 13 February 2014
Place in performance rating 661 664
Type Desktop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $99
Price now $260.70
Value for money (0-100) 11.25

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1300 MHz 1000 MHz
Compute units 24
Core clock speed 300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 499.2 GFLOPS
Pipelines 192 640
Pixel fill rate 10.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 15.60 GTexel/s 38 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 80 Watt
Floating-point performance 1,216 gflops
Stream Processors 640
Transistor count 1,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Length 210 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1 x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 128 Bit
Shared memory 1
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 96 GB/s
Memory clock speed 1625 MHz
Memory type GDDR5

Technologies

Quick Sync
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync