Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 730 and AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 730

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1050 MHz
  • 309.5x more texture fill rate: 15.60 GTexel/s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 5.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 85 Watt
  • Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 vs 3667
  • Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 vs 3667
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2021 vs 5 May 2015
Boost clock speed 1300 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Texture fill rate 15.60 GTexel/s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 85 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 5221 vs 3667
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 5221 vs 3667

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

  • 3.3x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 4x more pipelines: 768 vs 192
  • Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3032 vs 1587
  • Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 vs 400
  • 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14269 vs 5950
  • Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4468 vs 2429
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3309
  • Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4468 vs 2429
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3309
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 768 vs 192
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3032 vs 1587
PassMark - G2D Mark 460 vs 400
Geekbench - OpenCL 14269 vs 5950
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4468 vs 2429
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 vs 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4468 vs 2429
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 vs 3309

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1587
3032
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
400
460
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5950
14269
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2429
4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5221
3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2429
4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5221
3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
3340
Name Intel UHD Graphics 730 AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 1587 3032
PassMark - G2D Mark 400 460
Geekbench - OpenCL 5950 14269
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2429 4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 5221 3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3309 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2429 4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 5221 3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3309 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 603
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 39.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 815.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.437
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 63.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 171.258

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 730 AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

Essentials

Architecture Generation 12.1 GCN 2.0
Code name Rocket Lake GT1 Tobago
Launch date 2021 5 May 2015
Place in performance rating 662 665
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1300 MHz 1050 MHz
Compute units 24
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 499.2 GFLOPS
Pipelines 192 768
Pixel fill rate 10.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 15.60 GTexel/s 50.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 85 Watt
Floating-point performance 1,613 gflops
Transistor count 2,080 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 165 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 128 Bit
Shared memory 1
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 104.0 GB / s
Memory clock speed 6500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5

Technologies

Quick Sync