Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 730 and AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 309.5x more texture fill rate: 15.60 GTexel/s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 85 Watt
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 vs 3667
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 vs 3667
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 5 May 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s vs 50.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 vs 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 vs 3667 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 768 vs 192
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3032 vs 1582
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 vs 395
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14269 vs 5967
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4468 vs 2429
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3309
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4468 vs 2429
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3309
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 192 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3032 vs 1582 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 vs 395 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14269 vs 5967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4468 vs 2429 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4468 vs 2429 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3309 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1582 | 3032 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 395 | 460 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 | 14269 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 | 4468 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 | 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 | 4468 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 | 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 815.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.437 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.718 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 171.258 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 730 | AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | Tobago |
Launch date | 2021 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 661 | 663 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Compute units | 24 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 192 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 85 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,613 gflops | |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 165 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 104.0 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |