Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 730 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 261.2x more texture fill rate: 15.60 GTexel/s vs 59.72 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 412 vs 292
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 vs 3721
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 vs 3721
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 1 February 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s vs 59.72 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 vs 292 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 vs 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 vs 3721 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
- 4.5x more core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- 3.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 192
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4463 vs 1573
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 vs 5967
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 vs 2429
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3309
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 vs 2429
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3309
- 3.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2084 vs 603
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Pipelines | 640 vs 192 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4463 vs 1573 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 vs 5967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 vs 2429 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 vs 2429 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2084 vs 603 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 | 4463 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 | 292 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 | 17466 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 | 7239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 | 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 | 7239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 | 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 | 2084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Pascal |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | GP106B |
Launch date | 2021 | 1 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 633 | 595 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1493 MHz |
Compute units | 24 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s | 59.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,911 gflops | |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection |