Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 770 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 770

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 1392 MHz
  • 398.6x more texture fill rate: 23.20 GTexel/s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
  • 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 505 vs 462
  • Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1011.7 vs 799.414
  • Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.941 vs 30.523
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 4 Nov 2021 vs 25 October 2016
Boost clock speed 1450 MHz vs 1392 MHz
Texture fill rate 23.20 GTexel/s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 505 vs 462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1011.7 vs 799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 40.941 vs 30.523

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

  • 4.3x more core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
  • 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5039 vs 1880
  • 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17455 vs 7653
  • Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 46.442
  • Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 2.846
  • 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 94.384
  • 2.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1784 vs 739
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1290 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 640 vs 256
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 5039 vs 1880
Geekbench - OpenCL 17455 vs 7653
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 67.209 vs 46.442
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.536 vs 2.846
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 223.683 vs 94.384
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1784 vs 739

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
505
462
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1880
5039
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7653
17455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
46.442
67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1011.7
799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.846
4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
40.941
30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
94.384
223.683
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
739
1784
Name Intel UHD Graphics 770 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark 505 462
PassMark - G3D Mark 1880 5039
Geekbench - OpenCL 7653 17455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 46.442 67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1011.7 799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.846 4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 40.941 30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 94.384 223.683
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 739 1784
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3360

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 770 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Essentials

Architecture Generation 12.2 Pascal
Code name Alder Lake GT1 GP107
Launch date 4 Nov 2021 25 October 2016
Place in performance rating 828 590
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $109
Price now $124.99
Value for money (0-100) 56.95

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1450 MHz 1392 MHz
Compute units 32
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1290 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 185.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 1485 GFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 742.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 256 640
Pixel fill rate 11.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 23.20 GTexel/s 58.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt
CUDA cores 640
Floating-point performance 1,862 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 97 °C
Transistor count 3,300 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Multi monitor support

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0
Height 4.38" (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 5.7" (14.5 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 300 Watt
Supplementary power connectors None
Width 2-slot

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 112 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
GameStream
GPU Boost
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
ShadowWorks
VR Ready