Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 770 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 770

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 1033 MHz
• 370x more texture fill rate: 23.20 GTexel/s vs 62.7 billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
• 8.9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 134 Watt
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 465
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.442 vs 25.21
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1011.7 vs 561.43
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.846 vs 2.026
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.941 vs 30.868
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.384 vs 51.009

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

• 3.3x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 3x more pipelines: 768 vs 256
• Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 vs 1908
• Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9482 vs 7628
• 15.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1106 vs 72

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	532 465
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1908 3388
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7628 9482
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.442 25.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1011.7 561.43
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.846 2.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.941 30.868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.384 51.009
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	72 1106

Compare specifications (specs)